- #Lights out short vs feature how to
- #Lights out short vs feature movie
- #Lights out short vs feature upgrade
The main protagonist of the film also makes some off decisions once the nature of Diana becomes better known to her.
#Lights out short vs feature upgrade
Still, Diana did get quite the upgrade if you're considering her appearance in the short as compared to the film.įurther, I found most of the characters relatively one note and, frankly, boring.
Frankly, the medical science explanation of how and why this creature exists was a bit too goofy for my tastes. To be more specific, I really adored that concept in the Lights Out short, but was less fond of the complicated backstory added in the feature length film.
#Lights out short vs feature movie
Still, the movie falls flat for me when it comes to basically everything aside from the basic nature of Diana. The central conceit of the character remains a great concept, and it allows for some fun visual tricks that are well-mined throughout the length of the film. It's that last one with whom Diana shares the most common ground, but even still, she remains a fresh and original entity throughout the film. This alone makes it difficult to not want to draw comparisons to other named slashers, like Michael, Jason, and Freddy. I thought it was interesting for the film to give its other-worldly shadow monster the name Diana. I really adore the underlying conceit at the heart of Lights Out, that of a monstrous creature that only physically exists in the absence of light. This is doubtlessly good company to keep. The Film: In some ways, the feature-length Lights Out film follows in the footsteps of classic supernatural slasher films, like Halloween, Friday the 13th, and A Nightmare on Elm Street. This Shocktober season seemed like the perfect opportunity to finally catch up. So impressed by the originality and execution of this short film, that I even wrote a quick blurb about it in a much earlier article on this very website! That said, I've been interested in this particular film for longer than I ever knew a feature-length film was to be based upon it. He added that, when it comes to low budget horror, financiers can afford to take risks.The Pick: Lights Out began life as a 5 minute short film, which I had the pleasure of stumbling across on one of my many journeys across the vast wilderness that is the internet. To trust a filmmaker so lacking in fundamentals might sound imprudent, but Grey said he trusted Sandberg's vision.
#Lights out short vs feature how to
He didn't know when to say "action," let alone how to work with a crew. Wan co-produced Lights Out - especially helpful, given that Sandberg had no idea how to direct an actual movie.
Now Wan's synonymous with such low-budget, highly lucrative horror series as Insidious and The Conjuring. Wan's cheapie 2004 horror movie Saw spawned a six-part franchise that's earned nearly $500 million. He chose producer Lawrence Grey, who connected the newbie director with one of the most powerful figures in Hollywood: James Wan. "I had to make, like, a spreadsheet with everyone I'd talked to and what was said last just to keep track of it all," Sandberg says. But the video found fans among Hollywood agents, producers and managers. They entered Lights Out in a contest sponsored by the horror site Bloody Disgusting. "And we used IKEA lights and like, I built a dolly myself, and we shot in an evening after Lotta got off work," Sandberg recalls.
0 kommentar(er)
